[Please click on the advertisers on this site. Simply clicking on will help me keep this blog going. You are under no obligation to buy anything.]
The Big 12 was a great league--in football, basketball, women's basketball, and most other sports. Today, it's just a shadow of its former self. The powers that be have allowed this thing to deteriorate to the point that now we are simply trying to avoid further public embarrassment. I never fully understood why we demolished the Big 8. That conference seemed about the right size, a manageable size, and its teams were competitive. Generally, these conferences are about football. The Big 8 was anchored in the north by Nebraska University and in the south by the University of Oklahoma. The University of Colorado and Missouri were both a force to be reckoned with and the others, including Oklahoma State University, Iowa State University, Kansas and Kansas State had their moments. There was nothing greater than the rivalry between Nebraska and Oklahoma, a nationally televised football game every Thanksgiving. The whole nation anxiously awaited this game.
For some reason we decided to expand to a twelve school conference. The old Southwest Conference was dying and we allowed four of them to join with us and form the Big 12. The addition of the University of Texas, Texas A & M, Baylor and Texas Tech rounded out our conference. There was little reason to bring in Baylor, except to placate the politics of the Lone Star State. This Big 12 didn’t dominate the football world, but their claims of national titles, and their contention each year for an opportunity to play for the national title, certainly meant that every year they were going to be a factor to be considered.
Political mistakes were made in the operation of this conference. The league probably acquiesced too much to Texas in allowing that one state to dominate the governance of the conference. But, those things happen when you consider that one-third of the conference was in the State of Texas. And, Texas University is a rich and powerful school, so much so that an alliance between them and any other school gives new meaning to the phrase, “unequally yoked together.” The conference should have from day one stated the rules. They should have explained that each school got one vote and they would all have to live with the vote. And, if they did not want to abide by that simple rule, they should have had no place in the conference. When Texas decided to act independently, without going “independent”, by creating their Texas Network in conjunction with ESPN, this was a death knell for the conference. This should have been stopped before it ever got on the drawing board. There should never have been any place for such a “network” because the Big 12 should have formed its own before Texas ever suggested theirs. But, this wasn’t what started the fractures in the conference.
Every team in the league has had its “ups and downs.” Texas and Oklahoma, who seemed to dominate the conference, have had their moments at the head of the table and, in other years, they have both been deemed a mid-tier team, even though neither has been considered a mid-tier program. For years, the northern division of the conference was weak. Nebraska, of all teams, was weak. They had a change in their coaching staff and it has taken several years for them to get back on track. Colorado, after capturing a national championship and being a powerhouse was relegated to the sidelines of contention for a title. Iowa State and Missouri would show glimpses of talent, but they were never in contention. Kansas State enjoyed remarkable success under Bill Snyder and Kansas showed signs of improvement, but only briefly.
While the northern division of the conference only achieved mediocrity, Oklahoma State University was slowly climbing above that level of play and breaking into the level of contention for the top spot. If Nebraska, Missouri and Colorado had spent more time paying attention to their own program and less to Texas, they too could have improved and been competitive. Oklahoma State just got better. A donor helped bring their facilities up to date, but, more than that, they brought in a coach, a very talented young coach, who had ties to the university and would not use the position as a stepping stone to a bigger and better school and program. They have improved each year until the present season in which they are contending realistically for a shot at the national title.
There were early rumblings when the conference expanded to twelve members. Offices were moved to Irving, Texas, a suburb of Dallas, and some events which had always been in Kansas City were moved to Dallas. Not everything which oriented the conference in a southerly direction was bad. The four Texas schools were part of the conference and it was right that their geographical interests be taken into consideration as well as everyone else.
Once, in an interview, the head coach of the Texas Longhorns, referred to the time when “the Big 8 decided to join the Southwest Conference.” That revisionist history plays well in Texas, but it is of little value and merit elsewhere. The Southwest Conference disbanded and four of the homeless teams were invited to join the Big 8 and become the nucleus of the Big 12.
There were signs of weakening in the conference which were present in various teams, and it soon became evident that cracks in the team would corrupt the stability of the conference. The coach who led Colorado to a national championship was replaced by someone unable to continue their tradition. The same thing happened to Nebraska. Their coach retired and he was replaced by someone from that long, storied tradition who seemed poised to keep them up to their expected level. But, another administration came in who saw fit to replace him with someone with no understanding of the Nebraska tradition, someone who seemed to worry more about opposing teams’ mascots than with his own team’s performance. They were weakened and the conference paid the price.
Kansas State’s coach retired and his replacement was unable to build on the work of his predecessor. Texas Tech’s coach had a controversy with a television personality’s son and he was accused of mistreating the kid. The university fired him and, in so doing, weakened the team. We quickly saw that a team cannot be harmed without doing harm to the conference. And, then we saw it again in Kansas. A coach brought them out of the basement of insignificance, only to be discovered cursing at the players. He was mean to the kids and they ran him off, damaging the team and cracking the foundation of the conference.
Missouri, for whatever reason, decided it wanted to leave the Big 12. They wanted to go to the Big 10 where they had greater academic standards. We all smiled at that rationale, knowing all along that there was more to it than that, suspecting that their anger at Texas was the greater reason. They toyed with this for some time and the Big 10 decided they needed to expand. They invited Nebraska to jump to the Big 10 and Nebraska jumped. Nebraska had never tried to hide their contempt toward Texas and the way they had attempted to dominate the conference. It may have been short sighted, but Nebraska cut its ties with traditional rivalries and alliances and moved on the Big 10. Missouri? Their invitation to join the Big 10 must have been lost in the mail; they had to remain in the Big 12.
Oddly, as Nebraska was cutting and running to the Big 10, Colorado left the conference and became a part of the PAC 10. We didn’t see that coming. Perhaps they too thought they were moving to a better academic conference. They don’t have any better sports record in that conference than they had in the Big 12. The cracks in the foundation of the conference were getting worse.
This year has been a year of instability for the Big 12. Playing with only ten teams, following the departure of Nebraska and Colorado, realignment has become the major story both in this conference and throughout the country. For a time, it looked like the Big 12 might cease to exist. Texas A & M announced it was going to move into the SEC. Oklahoma and Texas announced they were being courted by the PAC 10 and were considering a move. Several of our smaller members had no idea what would happen to them or where they might be able to go. It was finally announced that Oklahoma and Texas would remain in the Big 12 and try to make it work.
Texas A & M did little to hide their disdain for Texas and their complaining suggested an inferior feeling, a feeling they could not compete with their big brother living down the road. A & M has a tradition in football and they should be able to compete with anyone. It isn’t likely that they will be able to do any better in the SEC than they were could have done in the Big 12. I hate to lose them.
Missouri stuck its ugly head up again, saying they were going to the SEC. They didn’t say this time that they were seeking academic excellence. Had they done that, we would have probably broken out in laughter all over the country. The interesting thing is that today (10/31/2011) we are still waiting to see the formal invitation from the SEC to Missouri to join them.
The conference has tried to hold its numbers together by the addition of Texas Christian University (TCU) and West Virginia. Whether these will be successful additions to the conference is still to be seen, but the resulting conference cannot be as good as when it included Nebraska and Texas A & M. It’ll do, but not much more than that can be said.
No one knows what lies ahead for the Big 12. Perhaps one day Oklahoma, Oklahoma State and Texas will go ahead and relocate with another conference. If that happens, the remaining teams will be left trying to make do as best they can. The real problem is that we are sparsely populated in the Great Plains, the natural geographical location for the conference. And a sparse population means limited television sets and television money drives collegiate football. That’s why we need an alliance with Texas. That’s why Texas carries such a big stick; there’s a lot of television sets in that state.
Whatever is going to happen in the future, this is where we are today. We still have member universities, including Iowa State, Kansas State, Kansas, Missouri, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, Texas Tech, Texas University, Baylor, TCU and West Virginia. We are still waiting to for the SEC to extend its invitation to Missouri. If and when it does, Missouri will be gone and they will likely not be heard of anymore. The remaining members of the conference will continue to be member universities. Texas will still be Texas. Oklahoma will continue to be Oklahoma. We will all have good sports programs, we will all battle for conference titles and, from time to time, we will compete for national titles. The rivalry between Oklahoma and Nebraska is a thing of the past and it is sorely missed. The rivalry between Kansas and Missouri will become a thing of the past and it, too, will be sorely missed. But, the Big 12 will continue to be a force in collegiate sports.
No comments:
Post a Comment